பாயும் வேகம் ஜெட் லீ தாண்டா
பன்ச் வெச்சா இட்லி தாண்டா
Rated PG - for Pseudo-DK, DMK, Liberals, Marxists....
ஊர்ல சொல்றது சொலவடை
உண்மையைச் சொல்றது இட்லிவடை

Tuesday, April 07, 2009

Raul Vinci Code

இன்றைய இந்தியன் எக்ஸ்பிரஸ் நாளிதழில் வந்த செய்தி.



இந்த செய்திக்கு கீழே வந்த கூகிள் விளம்பரம் ...

பாதுகாப்பு காரணங்களுக்காக எனது பெயர் இப்பொழுது "ஹிட்லர் படை"

15 Comments:

மானஸ்தன் said...

அய்யா இட்லி வடை அவர்களே!
அந்த Cambridge இங்கிலீஷ் matter புரியுது!!
அந்த student "ராகுல் வின்சி" ஐயா! ராகுல் காந்தி என்று எங்கயும் சொல்லல!!

மேலும் அவங்க அம்மா கூட "secretarial typing mistake" என்று சொல்லி இருக்காங்க பாருங்க!!! அப்டி பாத்தா இந்த "certificate" குடுத்தது நம்ம "wall" ராகுல் (dravid)க்கு என்று கூட வெச்சுக்கலாம்!!! :-D :-)

அப்பொறம் பேரப் பாருங்க! அது "raul" and NOT "rahul"...
அதுனால அந்த அம்மா சொன்னது "சரியாக்கூட" இருக்கலாம்!

எதுக்கும் நம்ம "CBI" வெச்சு ஒரு விசாரணை பண்ணி தீர்ப்ப சொல்ல சொல்லுங்க ஒரு 20 வருஷத்துல!

கடைசியா ஒரு விண்ணப்பம்! என்ன மாதிரி "இந்தி" தெரியாத/புரியாத ஆசாமிங்களுக்காக அந்த "கூகிள்" விளம்பரத்த கொஞ்சம் விளக்கிடுங்க!

Krish said...

அமெரிக்க ல படிச்சேன், அங்கே படிச்சேன், இங்க படிச்சேன் ன்னு சொல்லிகரதுல அப்டி என்ன 'அல்ப' சந்தோசமோ?

sriram said...

இந்த பதிவுக்கும், CBI பதிவுக்கும் ஒரே பின்னூட்டம்- என்னத்த சொல்ல? கேடுகெட்ட கட்சி இன்னும் கேடுகெட்ட அதன் தலைவர்கள்.
அப்துல் கலாமை வேண்டாம் என்று சொன்ன கும்பல்தானே இது, இதுங்க கிட்டேயிருந்து வேறென்ன எதிர் பார்க்க முடியும்
என்றும் அன்புடன்
ஸ்ரீராம் Boston USA

மஞ்சள் ஜட்டி said...

நூறு டாலர் குடுத்தா எந்த மாதிரி சர்டிபிகட் வேணுமினாலும் கிடைக்கும்...இன்டர்நெட் ல...எனவே, ராகுல் காந்தி படிச்சா என்ன படிக்காட்டி என்ன...ஒரு மண்ணும் புடுங்க முடியாது...

(கரகாட்டக்காரன் படத்துல வர்ற மாதிரி... "அமெரிக்காவுல மைகேல் ஜேக்சன் கூபிட்டாக, ஜப்பான் ல ஜாக்கி சான் கூபிட்டாக" ன்னு சொல்லுவார்..காத்து இருக்கு இல்ல ?? ரத்தம் வர்ற வரை கேட்டுக்குங்க....

இந்த கருமாந்திரங்களை கேட்டு நாம மொக்கையா ஆதங்க பட்டுக்க வேண்டியது தான்.. (அதாங்க ...வாக்காளர்கள்)...

Anonymous said...

MuKa can sleep in private hospital.
but ராகுல் can't study(kind of) abroad.
so you guys want him to study in one of those grt grand father named or gramma named or pa named institution in filthy india..

Anonymous said...

இந்த ராவூல் மட்டும் அல்ல அவன் அம்மா, அப்பா, பாட்டி என்று எல்லோருமே படிப்பு விஷயத்தில் பொய் சொன்ன கிரிமினல்கள்தான், ராவூலின் அம்மா இன்னும் இந்தியக் குடிமகளாகவே தன்னை மாற்றிக் கொள்ளவில்லை. சோனியாவின் அஃபிடவிட்டே செல்லாது என்று சுவாமி மீண்டும் போர்க்கொடி தூக்கியுள்ளார். ஆம் இன்னும் சோனியா தன் இத்தாலிக் குடியுரிமையை விட்டுக் கொடுக்கவில்லை இந்தியாவிலும் தனக்குக் குடியுரிமை வாங்கிக் கொள்ளவில்லை. ஆனால் நவீன் சாவு லாக்கள் இருக்கும் பொழுது அதைப் பற்றி என்ன கவலை. கீழ்க்கண்ட கட்டுரையைப் படியுங்கள். குடும்பமே சரியான 420 கேசுகள் என்பது புரியும்


http://news.hinduworld.com/click_frameset.php?ref_url=%2Findex.php%3F&url=http%3A%2F%2Fvivekajyoti.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F04%2Fms-sonia-gandhis-rae-bareli-nomination.html

from S. Kalyanaraman

date Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:09 PM
subject Ms. Sonia Gandhi's Rae Bareli nomination papers should be rejected -- Dr. Swamy

06.04.2009
PRESS RELEASE, Janata Party

The nomination of Ms.Sonia Gandhi as a candidate for Lok Sabha from Rae Bareli is liable to be rejected because her name does not appear in the Home Ministry records of all registered citizens of India. There is a name of one Ms.Antonia Maino, born in Luciana, Italy, who has been granted citizenship of India in 1983. But Ms.Sonia Gandhi claims, according to Lok Sabha records, as having being born in Orbassano, Italy. Moreover there is no G.O or official notification which is required, that Sonia Gandhi is the changed name of Ms.Antonia Maino.

Moreover, Ms.Sonia Gandhi, even if she is Ms.Antonia Maino, has not submitted an official certificate from Italy Internal Affairs Department that she has formally renounced her Italian citizenship. This is a mandatory requirement for grant of Indian citizenship. Hence on these two counts Ms.Sonia Gandhi must produce proof of Indian citizenship at the time of scrutiny of her nomination forms. Otherwise her nomination papers must be rejected.

(SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY)
...............................................


http://news.hinduworld.com/click_frameset.php?ref_url=%2Findex.php%3F&url=http%3A%2F%2Fvivekajyoti.blogspot.com%2F2009%2F04%2Ftale-of-false-affidavits-ec-should-send.html
from S. Kalyanaraman
date Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 3:22 PM
subject Tale of false affidavits. EC should send a notice of perjury against Rahul -- Dr. Swamy

07.04.2009 - PRESS RELEASE of Janata Party

The revelation in New Indian Express, Chennai today of the false claim of Mr. Rahul Gandhi made in his sworn affidavit that he holds a M Phil in Development Economics from Trinity College, Cambridge University calls from an immediate Notice for perjury to be sent to him by the Election Commission. Otherwise, I shall move the Courts for action.

The revelation confirms the disclosure I made after a visit to the Department of Development Studies, University of Cambridge in 2005. I was informed by the Department’s library and revealed in its computer, that Mr. Gandhi did not complete his M Phil degree because he had failed the National Economic Planning and Policy exam and hence could not fulfil the mandatory requirement of writing a M Phil thesis (much less defend it). Also, Trinity College does not award M Phil degrees, and Development Studies Department has nothing to do with the Economics Department.

Moreover, according to University records Mr. Gandhi as Raul Vinci had given his citizenship as ‘Italian citizen by birth since born to an Italian mother”, and holds an Italian passport in that name. He also paid his fees from a numbered account in a tax-haven bank.

Incidentally, Mr. Gandhi had failed the first year B,A in St. Stephan’s College in Delhi because, as his sister had in Jesus and Mary College, he failed the Hindi compulsory course exam.

(SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY)

* * *
‘STALE’ TALE OF TWO FALSE AFFIDAVITS
http://www.newstodaynet.com/col.php?section=20&catid=33

Sonia Gandhi covered herself with ever lasting fame and glory by filing false affidavits relating to her non-existent Cambridge University academic qualifications before the District Election Officer concerned in U.P. in 1999 and 2004.



This sublime record of rectitude and decency in public life—positively NOT GANDHIAN but definitely Sonia Gandhian—has not only been maintained but enriched by Rahul Gandhi in his sworn affidavit relating to his candidature in Amethi Parliamentary Constituency which he filed before the District Election Officer concerned in Sultanpur District in U.P. two days ago. It is now clear to all concerned that Rahul Gandhi has filed a false affidavit. He has made a false declaration regarding three main related points about his own academic record in Cambridge University. Firstly, according to the certificate issued by Diana Kazemi, Secretary, Development Studies, University of Cambridge on 22nd April 2008, Rahul Gandhi studied there during the academic year 2004-2005 and not in 1995 as stated by him in his sworn affidavit. Secondly, this recent Certificate makes it clear that he did his M.Phil in Development Studies and not Development Economics as declared by him in his sworn affidavit. Thirdly, he has declared that he took his M.Phil from Trinity College of the University of Cambridge, UK. This is not factually correct. Thus Rahul Gandhi, like his even more distinguished mother in this glorious field, is guilty of the offence of perjury under Sections 179 and 191 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and punishable under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). They are also guilty of offences under Section 125A of the Representation of People’s Act (RPA) 1951.

In addition he is also guilty of tendering false evidence under Section 199 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which reads as follows:

‘False Statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidence/whoever, in any declaration made or subscribed by him which declaration any Court of Justice or any Public Servant or other person is bound or authorized by Law to receive as evidence of any fact, makes any Statement which is false and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, touching any point/material to the object for which the declaration is made or used shall be punished in the same manner as if he gave false evidence’.

First we had the stage managed saga of sacrifice of Sonia Gandhi giving up the post of Prime Minister in 2004 after her election as MP after filing a false affidavit before the District Election Officer in Rae Barielly regarding her outstanding educational qualifications! Now Rahul Gandhi has given a false affidavit two days ago at Sultanpur relating to his unsurpassed educational qualifications!! Thus both mother and son have committed punishable offences under the Indian Penal Code by giving false evidence before a Public Servant regarding their own election. The mother (Sonia) has been hailed by our surrogate Prime Minister as the tallest leader in our land. The more distinguished son (Rahul) has been praised by our surrogate Prime Minister as eminently fit for being appointed as a Union Cabinet Minister. The latest prize of acclaim won by Rahul Gandhi is from the hands of one of the senior most Union Cabinet Ministers Pranab Mukherjee. He has recently declared from the public platform that Rahul Gandhi will be the best choice for the post of Prime Minister.

In this suffocating atmosphere of politically shameless sycophancy, petrified adolescence and sanctimonious humbug, I am reminded of the following immortal words of William Shakespeare:

‘You guilded loam,
You painted clay,
Out-dared dastard,
Caitiff recreant,
Traitor,
Foul and dangerous,
Guilty soul,
Lunatic, lean-witted fool,
Most degenerate,
A parasite,
Keeper-back of Death,
Banished traitor,
Caterpillar of the commonwealth,
THOU COWARD MAJESTY!’

When Dr Subramanian Swamy was raising valid legal issues relating to the bogus and fraudulent educational qualifications of Sonia Gandhi from the University of Cambridge, UK, in 2006, in these columns on 21-4-2006 in an Article titled ‘Swamy’s Salvo against Sonia’, I had observed as follows: ‘Is it not shameful for Sonia Gandhi, that her academic credentials are being questioned by Dr Subramanian Swamy, the former Law and Commerce Minister of India? Very unfortunately for Sonia and her bonded henchmen in her party, the academic credentials of Dr Subramanian Swamy are impeccable. When I see some of the Indian politicians like Sonia Gandhi parading their doubtful academic degrees, I cannot help referring to the salutary example of Sir Winston Churchill. Sir Winston Churchill never went to a college or University, nor did he ever claim to have done so. Nevertheless he won the Nobel Prize for Literature, quite unlike our treacherous Congressmen wangling Padma Awards for themselves through their sordid political influence. At a convocation function in one of the famous American Universities, Sir Winston Churchill observed: 'I have received more number of degrees than I have passed exams'. But then he derived his inner strength from himself and not from external trappings like offices of profit, or offices of non-profit under the tottering Government of India. And of course he did not have a questionable citizenship! I am compelled to state this in spite of the fact that examples of this kind are totally irrelevant in the murky context of criminalized Indian Politics today.’

When Dr Subramanian Swamy filed the Writ Petition in the Supreme Court in 2007 challenging the false affidavit of Sonia Gandhi, tragically and disastrously for the innocent and mute millions of India, a three-Judge Bench comprising Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and Justices B P Singh and G P Mathur asked Dr Subramanian Swamy: 'Should the Supreme Court go into all the affidavits to find out they are false or not. Further investigation is not possible into a stale issue and it should be dropped.'

In these columns on 19th May 2007, in an Article titled ‘The darkest day in our legal history’ had stated: ‘What has been completely overlooked by the Supreme Court in this case is the fact that Sonia Gandhi committed the offence of perjury when she wittingly dropped her claim regarding her bogus educational qualifications from Cambridge University in the Affidavit which she filed before the Returning Officer of Rae Barelli Constituency in 2006.... After the disastrous and wholly avoidable dark day of partition of India on the 15 August 1947, we as a nation sank to abysmal depths of irretrievable degradation yesterday which in my view is the darkest day in our legal history. All the patriotic and LAW abiding citizens of India owing their allegiance to the letter and spirit of the Indian Constitution are shocked beyond words by the fact that the Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a special leave petition filed by Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy against a judgment of the Allahabad High Court that did not allow the court to go into the veracity of an affidavit filed by Congress president Sonia Gandhi regarding her educational qualification while contesting the poll from Rae Barelli constituency. As a citizen believing in the Rule of Law, Rule of Equality Before the Law and the Majesty of Law, I am not convinced by the observation of the Supreme Court. 'Further investigation is not possible into a stale issue and it should be dropped.' In this context, I would like to quote the brilliant words of American Chief Justice William Hubbs Rehnquist (1924 - 2005) in the landmark case of MILLS v. HABLUETZEL, 456 U.S. 91 (1982): 'This Court has held that once a State posits a judicially enforceable right of its citizens, it can never get circumscribed or circumvented by a State's interest in avoiding the prosecution of stale or fraudulent claims'.

In this context, I would also like to cite from another historic case in the American Supreme Court which is very relevant to the Indian situation in the case under review. To quote Justice Felix Frankfurter (1882- 1965): ‘To argue that no genuine issues of material fact remain for trial, is to sweep the entire expanse of American History under the rug as well, and to substitute in its place a veritable host of fictions and fictitious nonsense, of which the American People now have had about all they are willing to take.. Competent waivers of fundamental rights must be knowing, intelligent, affirmative acts done with sufficient awareness, other relevant circumstances and likely consequences.'

All the enlightened citizens and the myriad millions of India were shocked by the wholly one-sided and partisan verdict of the Supreme Court in favour of Sonia Gandhi. The people of India as a whole did not consider it as a STALE VIEW ON A STALE SUBJECT. No honourable and law abiding citizen of India today would care to move the Supreme Court to declare that Rahul Gandhi two days ago has filed a false affidavit regarding his educational qualifications in the same manner as his mother Sonia Gandhi had done in 1999. Their only fear is that there is every possibility of the benefit of the Majesty of Staleness Doctrine laid down by the Supreme Court in 2007 being extended to the false affidavit of Rahul Gandhi also today without any judicial compunction –-- and of course without any further judicial remedy, now or forever.

In my humble opinion neither the incontrovertible facts nor the irrefutable points of law raised by Dr Subramanian Swamy in 2006-2007 can be viewed as STALE in any sense of the word/term. Of course there is nothing fraudulent in or about them. The hopelessly helpless millions of India are of the view that the survival of India as an independent sovereign nation has been completely lost sight of by the highest tribunal of law in the land. All of them are quoting the following words of Rt. Honourable Srinivasa Sastri (1869 -1946) with approval: 'If the salt has lost its flavour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out and trodden under foot of men.' GOD SAVE India AND HER PEOPLE! GOD SAVE OUR MOTHERLAND! JAI HIND!

(The writer is a retired IAS officer)
e-mail the writer at
vsundaram@newstodaynet.com

நாகு (Nagu) said...

ஒரு ராஜகுமாரன் எதுக்கு வெளிநாட்டுக்கு போறான்? அங்க போயி 'சந்தோஷமா' இருக்கறதுக்கு. அதுல போயி சர்ட்டிபிகேட்டு, நொட்டு, நொள்ளைன்னுட்டு...

நாளைக்கு உங்கள ஆள்றதுக்கு ஒரு சவுத் அமெரிக்கன் குட்டி வரும், தயாரா இருங்கடே!

R.Gopi said...

//எதுக்கும் நம்ம "CBI" வெச்சு ஒரு விசாரணை பண்ணி தீர்ப்ப சொல்ல சொல்லுங்க ஒரு 20 வருஷத்துல! //

*********

Maanasthan in full form TODAY.

நான் அவன் இல்லீங்கோ said...

அட போங்க பாஸ் இந்த நேரத்தில் இந்த பழைய செய்தியை உங்களுக்கு நினைவு படுத்த விரும்புகிறேன், இதுக்கு என்ன சொல்றீங்க?? http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2007/01/rahul-gandhi-involved-in-gang-rape_17.html என்னமோ பரிட்சைல பாஸ் ஆகலயம். இந்த விஷயத்தையே மூடிட்டாங்க. கேட்டா ஆதாரம் இருக்கா சாட்சி இருக்கானு கேப்பானுங்க, நல்லா கேக்குறிங்க கேள்வி.

Anonymous said...

rahul enna dalit'aa illa sirupaanmai ina sirpiyaa(muslim) illa christinaa..

MuKa.. rahul is also a paapaan..athu mattum yaen ungalku theriyala..

லவ்டேல் மேடி said...

பரதேசி பயலுவ .... எல்லாத்துலையும் அரசியல நொளச்சிருறாங்க ....!!!!!

Cinema Virumbi said...

இட்லிவடை / மானஸ்தன் ,

'aam aadmi ke badte kadham,

har kadam par Bharat buland'

என்றால்

'சாதாரண மனிதனின் முன்னேறும் அடிகள் ,
ஒவ்வோர் அடியிலும் வலிமையாகும் பாரதம்'

(அடிகள் என்றால் எடுத்து வைக்கும் அடிகள், Footsteps, அடிக்கும் அடி அல்ல!)

நன்றி,

சினிமா விரும்பி

மானஸ்தன் said...

"அடி"ச்சா கண்டிப்பா "வலி"க்கும் !!! ரொம்ப சரி!!

ரொம்ப நன்றி, திரு சினிமா விரும்பி அவர்களே for "translating" the hindi stuff!

Inba said...

Raul needs to go long way.

instead of writing wrongly abt his study,he should write he is one of uneducated in abroad, then only he will become successful indian politician and can win in the elections and will become PM easily

Annai Sonia's training is not enough for him...

Krish said...

// நாளைக்கு உங்கள ஆள்றதுக்கு ஒரு சவுத் அமெரிக்கன் குட்டி வரும், தயாரா இருங்கடே!////

Nice!

அதுக்கும் நம்ம காங்கிரஸ் காரங்க சேலை தொவச்சி போடுவாங்க! அம்மா தாயே பிச்சை எடுப்பாங்க